Best point of sales system for greenhouse

#Best point of sales system for greenhouse full#

A larger garden retailerВ looking to invest more in technology can review Epicor, NCR CounterPoint, RetailPro, RMS or SimPOS. For a smaller retailer ($400,000 or less a year in sales), QuickBooks POS or ShopKeep can be a good fit. The green industry is blessed to have a ton of good choices for POS systems. On the other hand, if landscaping represents 50 percent of your business, that divisionвЂ™s needs should be given more weight on the priorities list. If floral represents 15 percent of your annual sales, buying a system to address floral may not serve the garden store or the nursery very well. Those kinds of assumptions can cause everyone problems.ДЄfter you have compiled your list of needs, prioritize the list. DonвЂ™t assume that the latest and greatest POS system will have the report from your old system on which you run your operation. Make sure all the things you like and depend on from your current system are on the list. You may have a POS system that you absolutely hate, but there are things in that system you rely on every day. Your head cashier, receiving clerk and accountant will have different needs, but their input is vital. Remember to include your staff when compiling the list. The first thing anyone looking at their existing system (or looking for a new system) should do is write out a list of what they need. The town is exploring options to off-set the costs for the certification process.Determine Your Needs, Then Prioritize Them For BIG processing, a there is an additional fixed cost of $400. Point Rating Certification would be in the range of $800 to $2, 000 depending on the size of the project. This would depend, however, on the specific proposals and complexity of the project. Point Rating system into a local house planning project should be minimal, but there would be some added construction cost. , data from local architects, the cost to add the Green. annually For an average size house in town, it would likely be double the Santa Rosa example. For a 2, 600 sf home the C 02 savings would be from 1, 300 lbs. The C 02 savings, on an annual basis, were found to range from. BIG) could cost $1 to $8 per sf (low to high), with a payback period between 5 -12 years. For a single family house, roughly 2, 600 sf (largest evaluated), the study found implementing Tier 1 (50 pts. Point system & estimated incremental costs related to point tiers, pay-back time & annual Ghg savings. It set Tiers for single family homes, based on Green. v benefit analysis for the City of Santa Rosa evaluated the BIG program.

The financial benefits of green building include lower energy, waste disposal and water costs, lower environmental and emissions costs, lower operation and maintenance costs and healthier and more productive living environments.

Since 2003, the вЂњupfrontвЂќ costs have been decreasing rapidly and BIG has found that in many cases costs for green are equivalent to or less than for вЂњstandardвЂќ building practices.

A comprehensive вЂњgreen buildingвЂќ analysis by the State of California in 2003 concluded that, at that time, an initial вЂњminimal upfrontвЂќ investment of 2% of construction costs typically yields life cycle savings of over 10 times the initial investment.

These would be considered at public meetings later this year prior to adoption.Д¬osts v. April 2009 With workshop input, Subgroup to prepare final recommendations to the town council for a Green building point rating system. PC, ASCC and TC concur and town proceeds with additional Public Outreach Workshops, Feb.

#Best point of sales system for greenhouse full#

2008 Subgroup tentative recommendations shared with full PC, ASCC and town council. April 2008 вЂњBuilding greenвЂќ public participation workshop at Corte Madera School. December 2007 PC, ASCC & BEET subgroup begins one year process to develop recommendations for a Green building rating system.

October 2007 Council tasks Planning Commission, ASCC and BEET committee to develop options for local Green building rating systems. Part of a multi-front climate protection plan.

July 2007 Building, Energy Efficiency & Transportation (BEET) Committee of town Climate Protection Task Force recommends adoption of rating & tracking system for new construction & substantial remodels. Steps to Selection of PV Green Building Rating System A deliberate and careful process January 2006 San Mateo County вЂњSustainability ChecklistвЂќ required as a project design tool.